Skip to content

docs: clarify mixed comparison/equality in operator precedence #9864

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
orizi merged 1 commit into from
Apr 22, 2026
+5 −0
Merged

docs: clarify mixed comparison/equality in operator precedence #9864

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
5 changes: 5 additions & 0 deletions ...src/components/cairo/modules/language_constructs/pages/operator-precedence.adoc
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -76,6 +76,11 @@ Write it with logical conjunctions instead:
let all_equal = a == b && b == c;
----

Mixed consecutive comparison/equality operators are also not supported
(for example, `a < b == c` or `a == b < c`).
Use explicit conjunctions or parenthesized boolean comparisons to express intent.
The parser reports these forms as `E1028` (consecutive comparison operators).

== Related

- xref:operator-expressions.adoc[Operator expressions]
Expand Down
Loading