Verify YM C263 massless relative-tail soft-mode firewall - #905
Draft
stevemoraco wants to merge 4 commits into
Draft
Verify YM C263 massless relative-tail soft-mode firewall#905stevemoraco wants to merge 4 commits into
stevemoraco wants to merge 4 commits into
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Public guarded replay for the finite scalar source from RH-Lean C263.
The source proves only the massless soft-mode firewall: if
1/lamis split into a uniformly bounded finite-scale part and a complementary tail, sufficiently soft modes force that tail to carry arbitrarily close to the full Green weight. This blocks a naive uniform strict relative-tail argument without an additional soft-mode zero.Failed-first chronology
32213025438 / 95949262067: parser failure from the reserved Greek lambda token; non-evidence.32213081789 / 95949418683: two core declarations compiled, optional third reformulation failed and producedsorryAx; strict linter also caught dead/unused proof material; non-evidence.The source was reduced to the two load-bearing declarations without weakening them.
Clean guarded replay
Cached status is explicitly disclosed.
It does not formalize finite-range decomposition, BKAR, Yang–Mills, OS reconstruction, a mass gap, or a Clay theorem.
FIVE-ALARM OFF.