Verify YM C278 large-field suppression repair - #909
Draft
stevemoraco wants to merge 2 commits into
Draft
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Public guarded replay for RH-Lean C278.
The source formalizes only two finite facts: (1) a two-term union bound of one-plaquette size
1/2does not imply the product-style block bound(1/2)^2; (2) a nonnegative penalty threshold gives the correct pointwise exponential suppression.The source-level repair is that Faizal–Shabir Lemma 5.2's printed block-volume exponential is not obtained by (5.27)–(5.28), but the later Section-6
exp(-c lambda)large-field currency follows directly from the pointwise bad-event boundR_k <= exp(-lambda phi(delta)), with no plaquette independence.This verifier does not formalize Haar integration, RG, BKAR/KP, transfer operators, OS reconstruction, Yang–Mills, or a Clay theorem.
FIVE-ALARM OFF.