Skip to content

BinarySearch2#2333

Open
MeghaN28 wants to merge 2 commits intosuper30admin:masterfrom
MeghaN28:master
Open

BinarySearch2#2333
MeghaN28 wants to merge 2 commits intosuper30admin:masterfrom
MeghaN28:master

Conversation

@MeghaN28
Copy link
Copy Markdown

No description provided.

MeghaN28 and others added 2 commits April 14, 2026 12:29
Implemented a solution to find the first and last positions of a target in a sorted array using binary search.
@super30admin
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Find the First and Last Position of an Element in given Sorted Array (FindFirstandLast.java)

Note: The verdict should be PASS if the solution is correct, efficient, and follows good practices. Otherwise, it should be NEEDS_IMPROVEMENT.

Now, evaluate the student's solution.

VERDICT: NEEDS_IMPROVEMENT


Find the Minimum Element in a Rotated Array(sorted) (LowestElementRotatedArr.java)

Your solution is well-implemented and correctly addresses the problem. Here are some strengths and minor suggestions:

Strengths:

  • You correctly handle the base case where the array is already sorted (nums[low] <= nums[high]).
  • You properly check if the mid element is the minimum by comparing with neighbors, including boundary checks.
  • You effectively use binary search to reduce the problem size by half each time, ensuring O(log n) performance.
  • The code is readable and well-commented, which helps in understanding the logic.

Areas for Improvement:

  • The condition for checking if mid is the minimum could be simplified. The reference solution uses the same condition, but note that when the array has only one element, mid==0 and mid==nums.length-1, so the condition holds. However, it's correct as written.
  • Consider adding a fallback return statement at the end (like return -1) for completeness, even though the problem constraints ensure we always find a solution. Your code already has this, which is good.
  • The comment "Confused about checking the opposite of sorted side" suggests you initially struggled with this. Remember: the minimum element always lies in the unsorted part. If the left side is sorted (nums[low] <= nums[mid]), then the right side must be unsorted and contain the minimum, so you move low to mid+1. Conversely, if the right side is sorted, the left side must contain the minimum, so you move high to mid-1. Your code correctly implements this.

Overall, excellent work! Your solution is efficient and correct.

VERDICT: PASS


Find the Peak Element (FindPeak.java)

Your solution is well-implemented and efficient. It correctly uses binary search to achieve O(log n) time and O(1) space. The code is readable and you have provided good comments.

One minor point: In the else-if condition, you are accessing nums[mid+1] without explicitly checking if mid is the last element. However, your initial condition already ensures that when mid is the last element, it is handled as a peak and returns. So the code is safe. However, for clarity and to make it more robust (in case the first condition is modified), you could consider adding a check like mid < nums.length-1 in the else-if condition. But it is not strictly necessary here.

Another small note: The problem states that the array may contain multiple peaks and returning any one is fine. Your solution handles this correctly by moving towards the higher neighbor, which guarantees finding a peak.

Overall, great job! Your solution is correct and efficient.

VERDICT: PASS

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants