Skip to content

Binary-Search-2#2335

Open
hiteshmadapathi wants to merge 8 commits intosuper30admin:masterfrom
hiteshmadapathi:Summer2026
Open

Binary-Search-2#2335
hiteshmadapathi wants to merge 8 commits intosuper30admin:masterfrom
hiteshmadapathi:Summer2026

Conversation

@hiteshmadapathi
Copy link
Copy Markdown

No description provided.

@super30admin
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Find the First and Last Position of an Element in given Sorted Array (Minimum in Rotated Sorted Array.py)

It seems there has been a mix-up in the solution you provided. You submitted code for "Minimum in Rotated Sorted Array" instead of "Find the First and Last Position of an Element in given Sorted Array". Please double-check the problem you are solving and ensure your code matches the problem requirements.

For the problem "Find the First and Last Position...", you need to implement a binary search to find the first occurrence and the last occurrence of the target value. The reference solution provided uses two separate binary search functions: one to find the first index and one to find the last index. This approach runs in O(log n) time and O(1) space.

If you were working on "Minimum in Rotated Sorted Array", your current solution has some issues with boundary conditions. You should avoid accessing mid-1 and mid+1 without checking if mid is at the boundaries. Instead, you can compare nums[mid] with nums[high] to decide which half to search, and check if mid is the pivot by comparing with neighbors only when safe.

For the intended problem, here are some tips:

  1. Use binary search to find the first occurrence: check if the middle element is the target and if the left neighbor is not the target (or if mid is at start). If not, move left or right accordingly.
  2. Similarly, find the last occurrence: check if the middle is the target and the right neighbor is not the target (or mid is at end).
  3. If the target is not found in the first search, return [-1, -1].

VERDICT: NEEDS_IMPROVEMENT


Find the Minimum Element in a Rotated Array(sorted) (findPeakElement.py)

Strengths:

  • You have implemented a binary search algorithm correctly for the problem of finding a peak element.
  • The code is clean and uses appropriate variable names.
  • You handled edge cases (like when mid is at the first or last index) in the condition checks.

Areas for Improvement:

  • The main issue is that you solved the wrong problem. The problem asked is to find the minimum element in a rotated sorted array, not a peak element. Please carefully read the problem statement before starting to code.
  • For the rotated sorted array problem, the approach should be to compare the middle element with the endpoints to determine which half contains the minimum. The minimum is typically found at the point where the array is rotated.
  • You need to adjust your solution to handle the rotated array scenario. The reference solution provided can be a good starting point.

VERDICT: NEEDS_IMPROVEMENT


Find the Peak Element (README.md)

Your solution for "Find the Peak Element" is well-implemented. You correctly use binary search to achieve logarithmic time complexity. The conditions for checking if the mid element is a peak are accurate, and you handle the edge cases (like when mid is at the start or end of the array) appropriately. The code is clean and easy to follow.

One minor improvement: You can remove the condition if len(nums)==0: return -1 because the problem states that the array may contain multiple peaks, but it doesn't specify that the array could be empty. However, it's good practice to handle edge cases, so this is acceptable.

Another point: In the condition elif (mid!=len(nums)-1 and nums[mid+1]>nums[mid]), the check mid!=len(nums)-1 is redundant because if mid is the last element, the first condition (mid==len(nums)-1 or nums[mid]>nums[mid+1]) would have been true and returned. So, you can simplify it to just elif nums[mid+1] > nums[mid] because when mid is the last element, the first condition would have caught it. But your current code is safe and correct.

Overall, great job!

VERDICT: PASS

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants