Skip to content

Accept XLUnicodeRichExtendedString without reserved tag#571

Merged
jmcnamara merged 4 commits intotafia:masterfrom
sftse:c-dev
Oct 24, 2025
Merged

Accept XLUnicodeRichExtendedString without reserved tag#571
jmcnamara merged 4 commits intotafia:masterfrom
sftse:c-dev

Conversation

@sftse
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@sftse sftse commented Oct 23, 2025

Analogous to #525 where the same was done for XLUnicodeString, no file available for a test case.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@jmcnamara jmcnamara left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think the change to continue_record() is good.

However, I don't think the commit message does it justice. "refactor: remove distinction between None and vec.is_empty()" doesn't say where the distinction is being removed. For something like this I would add a commit message like:

xls: refactor CONTINUE record handling

Refactored Record::continue_record() to remove the distinction
between None and vec.is_empty().

@jmcnamara
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Overall the PR is good and I am happy to merge. Let me know if you wish to make any further changes.

@sftse
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

sftse commented Oct 24, 2025

GTM

@jmcnamara jmcnamara merged commit a36143b into tafia:master Oct 24, 2025
5 checks passed
@jmcnamara
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Merged. Thanks.

@sftse sftse deleted the c-dev branch October 24, 2025 11:20
@sftse sftse mentioned this pull request Oct 30, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants