I love jsx, vanjs does not have virtual DOM, that's good. but vanjs-jsx seems buggy.

[jackzhp]

I love jsx, vanjs does not have virtual DOM, that's good. but vanjs-jsx seems buggy.
Jsx is so clear to read, while the traditional vanjs codes just look messy.

why is it so difficult to convert the jsx to the pure vanjs with vanjs-element?

all effort to add jsx to vanjs are greatly appreciated!

[Tao-VanJS]

CC: @cqh963852

[cqh963852]

In JSX, tags can be easily converted to VanJS syntax.

However, JavaScript expressions within tags are more difficult to convert (the expressions are really quite complex).

<>
{
  values.map(v=>{
    return <SomeTag v={v}/>
  })
}
</>

should be convert to

vanX.list(() => Fragment, values, SomeTag),

---

As you know, covering every expression branch is a painful task. You can check out a portion of my Rust code written using biome.

https://github.com/idealjs/sapling/blob/main/packages/sapling_transformer/src/transformer.rs