Skip to content

Project modernisation#32

Open
kpmaalej wants to merge 11 commits into
vicpenap:masterfrom
kpmaalej:pullrequest
Open

Project modernisation#32
kpmaalej wants to merge 11 commits into
vicpenap:masterfrom
kpmaalej:pullrequest

Conversation

@kpmaalej

Copy link
Copy Markdown

iPhone 5 & iOS 6 compatibility, ARC, Storyboards.

Includes irrationalfab's patch from Jul 30th, 2012 and a full Storyboard example of my own.

@vicpenap

vicpenap commented Oct 1, 2012

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Hei that's good! And moving to ARC is a must, it's true.

The only thing is that your ARC changes makes PrettyKit no longer compatible with 4.0. In my opinion, once we break 4.0 compatibility, we should start using UIAppearance.

That would be quite a big change, and I would like to support 4.0 a bit more, so what if the change to ARC is made still supporting 4.0? (weak attribute can't be used, for example)

@kpmaalej

kpmaalej commented Oct 2, 2012

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

The Storyboard itself limits compatibility to iOS 5+. But the library itself can be kept compatible with iOS 4, true.

@vicpenap

vicpenap commented Oct 2, 2012

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

But your modifications don't force the use of storyboards, do them? I mean, what you changed was implementing initWithCoder, right? And that doesn't require iOS 5 at all, so the lib would be still compatible with iOS 4.

@kpmaalej

kpmaalej commented Oct 2, 2012

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Yes, that's exactly what I said: “the library itself can be kept compatible with iOS 4” :)

And that's what I just fixed, along with a couple other outstanding issues :)

@kpmaalej

kpmaalej commented Oct 8, 2012

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

up :)

@bringel

bringel commented Jan 19, 2013

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Is this ever going to get pulled into the project?

@vicpenap

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

It will, eventually. I don't have enough time to update pretty kit, but I
definitely want to switch to ARC and make some other improvements as well.

In the meantime it will be better that you use your own fork instead.

On 19 Xan, 2013, at 23:25, Bradley Ringel notifications@github.com wrote:

Is this ever going to get pulled into the project?


Reply to this email directly or view it on
GitHubhttps://github.com//pull/32#issuecomment-12462328.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants