docs: refine Security Batch governance hooks and CI smoke-fast schedule#19502
docs: refine Security Batch governance hooks and CI smoke-fast schedule#19502BrianCLong wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
Conversation
BrianCLong
added
the
codex
ChatGPT Codex Connector
|
Codex usage limits have been reached for code reviews. Please check with the admins of this repo to increase the limits by adding credits. |
Summary of ChangesHello, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request enhances the project's operational governance and CI efficiency. It establishes a more structured approach to security sprints, improves the discoverability and accountability of different workstreams through new labeling conventions, and optimizes continuous integration processes to ensure earlier detection of regressions. These changes aim to streamline workflows and bolster overall project readiness and security posture. Highlights
🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console. Changelog
Ignored Files
Activity
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded
⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. ⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (8)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request introduces significant improvements to the security governance process. It formalizes the 'Security Batch' sprint by adding a detailed issue template, new lane:* labels for workstream tracking, and comprehensive runbook documentation. The changes are well-structured and consistent across all modified files. I have one suggestion to simplify the new issue template by removing a redundant section, which should improve clarity for users.
| - type: checkboxes | ||
| id: verification | ||
| attributes: | ||
| label: Verification | ||
| options: | ||
| - label: CI workflow results reviewed (ci.yml) | ||
| - label: CIS benchmark evidence attached | ||
| - label: Security dashboard alerts triaged | ||
| - label: Follow-on issues created and labeled lane:security |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The verification checkboxes seem redundant as they largely overlap with the items in the acceptance-criteria checklist. This could lead to confusion and unnecessary duplication of effort.
To simplify the template, I suggest removing this verification section entirely. You could also consider changing the acceptance-criteria from a textarea to a checkboxes type to make it a more direct and enforceable checklist. For example:
- type: checkboxes
id: acceptance-criteria
attributes:
label: Acceptance Criteria
description: Ensure all criteria are met before closing the issue.
options:
- label: No open **high/critical** alerts in GitHub `security/code` view.
required: true
- label: CIS benchmark run completed in the last 7 days and archived.
required: true
- label: CI green on `.github/workflows/ci.yml` for touched components.
required: true
- label: Security batch findings logged as follow-on issues.
required: trueThis would make the template clearer and more streamlined.
![github-actions[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/15368?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
|
Temporarily closing to reduce Actions queue saturation and unblock #22241. Reopen after the golden-main convergence PR merges. |
1 similar comment
|
Temporarily closing to reduce Actions queue saturation and unblock #22241. Reopen after the golden-main convergence PR merges. |
1 participant
Motivation
Governed Exceptionsfield.lane:*labels and lane-specific Definitions of Done.smoke-fastjob to catch regressions outside of PR traffic.Description
Security Batchissue template at.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/security-batch.ymlincluding a requiredGoverned Exceptionstextarea and a reference todocs/SUMMIT_READINESS_ASSERTION.md..github/labels.jsonand.github/labels.yml(lane:security,lane:bizdev,lane:infra) and documented lane semantics inCONTRIBUTING.md.docs/security/SECURITY_BATCH.mdanddocs/security/SECURITY_CIS.mdto reference the readiness authority and to require Governed Exception capture for deviations.scheduletrigger plus asmoke-fastjob in.github/workflows/ci.ymlthat runspnpm ga:smokeand preserves existing typecheck/lint/unit pipelines.docs/roadmap/STATUS.jsonlast_updatedandrevision_noteto reflect these governance refinements.Testing
node scripts/check-boundaries.cjsto validate workspace boundary rules and it completed successfully.smoke-fastjob will run under GitHub Actions on schedule.Codex Task