Skip to content
Open
Changes from 3 commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
1 change: 1 addition & 0 deletions content/docs/configuration/acme/dns01/README.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -162,6 +162,7 @@ Links to these supported providers along with their documentation are below:
- [`AliDNS-Webhook`](https://github.com/pragkent/alidns-webhook)
- [`bizflycloud-certmanager-dns-webhook`](https://github.com/bizflycloud/bizflycloud-certmanager-dns-webhook)
- [`cert-manager-alidns-webhook`](https://github.com/DEVmachine-fr/cert-manager-alidns-webhook)
- [`cert-manager-alidns-webhook`](https://github.com/crazygit/cert-manager-alidns-webhook)(Suport ACK RRSA)
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks a bit odd. I am no expert on AliDNS, but why didn't you contribute "ACK RRSA" to the AliDNS webhook linked in the line above?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@erikgb Thanks for the question — I agree it’s important to avoid unnecessary duplication.

  • What’s different here: this repo is designed around ACK RRSA / OIDC and the Alibaba Cloud SDK default credential chain, so authentication happens on the webhook side without putting AK/SK into Issuer secrets. The existing AliDNS webhook is AK/SK‑based, configured via Issuer secrets, so the auth model is quite different.

  • Why I didn’t submit to the other repo: adding RRSA support there would likely be more than a small patch — it would involve changes to the auth flow, config schema, and docs, and I wanted to avoid disrupting existing AK/SK users. I also wanted to keep the RRSA‑first approach focused and clear, since it targets newer cert-manager versions and the ACK RRSA identity scenario specifically.

Thanks for considering this and for the review.

- [`cert-manager-webhook-abion`](https://github.com/abiondevelopment/cert-manager-webhook-abion)
- [`cert-manager-webhook-arvan`](https://github.com/kiandigital/cert-manager-webhook-arvan)
- [`cert-manager-webhook-civo`](https://github.com/okteto/cert-manager-webhook-civo)
Expand Down
Loading