Minor improvements to das-up-to-nevents.py#49045
Conversation
|
cms-bot internal usage |
|
@AdrianoDee please let me know if I missed anything here |
|
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-49045/46257
|
|
A new Pull Request was created by @kpedro88 for master. It involves the following packages:
@AdrianoDee, @DickyChant, @Moanwar, @antoniovagnerini, @cmsbuild, @miquork, @srimanob, @subirsarkar can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
| json_list = [c for c in json_list if "golden" in c.lower() and "era" not in c.lower() and "cert_c" in c.lower() and "ppref" not in c.lower()] | ||
| json_list = [[cc for cc in c.split(" ") if cc.lower().startswith("cert_c") and cc.endswith("json")][0] for c in json_list] | ||
| json_list_full = get_url_clean(cert_url).split("\n") | ||
| pattern = re.compile("(cert_collisions\d{4}_\d*_\d*_golden.json)$", re.IGNORECASE) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Maybe this regex could be directly cert_collisions\d{4}_\d{6}_\d{6}_golden.json ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I wasn't sure if we would still be in 6-digit run numbers by the end of the HL-LHC...
Thanks for making it cleaner |
|
please test |
|
-1 Failed Tests: RelVals RelVals-INPUT
RelVals
Expand to see more relval errors ...
RelVals-INPUT
Expand to see more relval errors ...
|
|
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-49045/46269
|
|
Pull request #49045 was updated. @AdrianoDee, @DickyChant, @Moanwar, @antoniovagnerini, @cmsbuild, @miquork, @srimanob, @subirsarkar can you please check and sign again. |
|
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-49045/46285 |
|
Pull request #49045 was updated. @AdrianoDee, @DickyChant, @Moanwar, @antoniovagnerini, @cmsbuild, @miquork, @srimanob, @subirsarkar can you please check and sign again. |
|
rebased and squashed |
|
please test |
|
+1 Size: This PR adds an extra 20KB to repository Comparison SummarySummary:
|
|
+pdmv |
|
@cms-sw/upgrade-l2 please sign |
|
+Upgrade |
|
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @sextonkennedy, @ftenchini, @mandrenguyen (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
|
+1 |
PR description:
PR validation:
Tested succeeding and failing commands before and after this change and saw intended results.
If this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for:
Not a backport, not intended to be backported unless requested.