Enable RPD reconstruction for 2025 and 2026 heavy-ion data#50063
Enable RPD reconstruction for 2025 and 2026 heavy-ion data#50063cmsbuild merged 6 commits intocms-sw:masterfrom
Conversation
|
cms-bot internal usage |
|
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-50063/47928 |
|
A new Pull Request was created by @hjbossi for master. It involves the following packages:
@Moanwar, @cmsbuild, @jfernan2, @mandrenguyen, @srimanob can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
|
@cmsbuild please test |
|
-1 Failed Tests: RelVals RelVals-INPUT The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic:
You can see more details here: Failed RelValsFailed RelVals-INPUT |
|
Well, it can be safely active only starting from fall 2025 HI data onwards 🤔 |
|
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-50063/47940 |
|
Pull request #50063 was updated. @Moanwar, @cmsbuild, @davidlange6, @fabiocos, @ftenchini, @jfernan2, @mandrenguyen, @srimanob can you please check and sign again. |
|
Looks like for summer 2025 HI |
|
This is unexpected behavior, but it is related to what @abdoulline suggests above. We will need to check where the conditions are set for the run the matrix workflows, this I am not familiar with. These are IOV based conditions, so we need to check that the run number picked up actually included RPD conditions... |
I'm afraid we cannot go back in time and modify Prompt conditions used in summer 2025 data taking. |
The issue could be fixed by changing in Configuration/Eras/python/Era_Run3_2025_UPC_OXY_cff.py : |
|
Thanks @stahlleiton, I have implemented your suggested workaround. Let's see if this fixes it. |
|
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-50063/49030 |
|
Pull request #50063 was updated. @Moanwar, @cmsbuild, @davidlange6, @fabiocos, @ftenchini, @jfernan2, @mandrenguyen, @srimanob can you please check and sign again. |
|
please test |
|
-1 Failed Tests: UnitTests Failed Unit TestsI found 1 errors in the following unit tests: ---> test test-das-selected-lumis had ERRORS Comparison SummarySummary:
|
|
please test |
|
+1 Size: This PR adds an extra 28KB to repository Comparison SummarySummary:
|
|
Seems to be OK now. |
|
Yes, I agree, tests look good - probably safe to merge these fixes. |
|
+1 |
|
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @mandrenguyen, @sextonkennedy, @ftenchini (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
|
+1 |
PR description:
This PR enables RPD reconstruction by default. Now safe due to incorporation and validation of the RPD geometry into the GT (see here: https://its.cern.ch/jira/browse/CMSALCA-348).
PR validation:
RPD reconstruction is run at foresting step for HIN, not included in central streams.
If this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for:
This PR is not necessary for past data-taking. Useful to have for the future - no backport needed.
Tagging HIN Colleagues: @mandrenguyen
Tagging HCAL colleagues: @abdoulline @akhukhun