formal: refactor and unify formality checks - #61
Conversation
0a99eb1 to
00aad6f
Compare
GeorgeSapkin
changed the title
00aad6f to
b7803a1
Compare
|
Ping @systemcrash , who has similar thing in LuCI repository. |
|
@GeorgeSapkin you can see my simple if condition here: ( I have no commit rights to the openwrt/actions-shared-workflows repo to amend that workflow ) |
|
Any reason luci has its own formalities (besides Weblate)? I thought they were shared between repos. Other than that, the checks look pretty similar. |
That's a good question, I asked the same while creating openwrt/luci#7821 and openwrt/luci@4dc7a4e#commitcomment-158889550 The goal is indeed to have it shared between all repos, though. 😇
No worries! Just go ahead and submit a PR. It'll be reviewed and merged if everything looks good. |
|
@BKPepe I think it's because weblate is only used by luci so it should be a specific workaround for that. It's ok if we add the workaround here tho :D |
b7803a1 to
20e5ca8
Compare
GeorgeSapkin
changed the title
|
I integrated the Weblate checks from luci feed and extracted the script to a separate file for easier maintainability and debugging. |
7b46c02 to
5c0448f
Compare
| fi | ||
|
|
||
| body="$(git show -s --format=%b $commit)" | ||
| sob="$(git show -s --format='Signed-off-by: %aN <%aE>' $commit)" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
While we're at it, I have a question and I’m not sure if we can address it within this PR.
@Ansuel, @aparcar, what is the policy on using AI to create pull requests and commits?
For example: openwrt/packages#27714
Is this accepted in OpenWrt? These changes are actually not bad and I would merge them, but they can’t pass our checks. :(
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@BKPepe that is annoying but a good point... Actually impressed by that pr. Aside from formal and stuff it looks O.K.
Maybe we should discuss them on mailing list.
|
@BKPepe do you think we are ok with merging this? |
BKPepe
left a comment
BKPepe
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Otherwise 👍. Thank you! This is really amazing. Hopefully, LuCI repository will use it as well to have really shared workflow.
|
@BKPepe if only github released the paid feature to introduce organization wide workflow... This would have been even easier to implement. |
Formality checks are now unified into a single script that is meant to be shared between all the feeds. Author and Signed-off-by email cannot be a GitHub noreply email as per the contributing guidelines. Add Weblate exceptions for the luci feed. Extract the script to a separate file for easier maintainability and debugging. Signed-off-by: George Sapkin <george@sapk.in>
5c0448f to
710b121
Compare
4 participants
Formality checks are now unified into a single script that is meant to be shared between all the feeds.
Author and Signed-off-by email cannot be a GitHub noreply email as per the contributing guidelines. Which is a common issues in luci and packages feeds.
Add Weblate exceptions for the luci feed.
Extract the script to a separate file for easier maintainability and debugging.
Example failing job: https://github.com/GeorgeSapkin/openwrt-packages/actions/runs/19117211025/job/54629195566?pr=3#step:5:7
Example passing job: https://github.com/GeorgeSapkin/openwrt-packages/actions/runs/19117490411/job/54630136784?pr=3#step:5:7
TODO: