Spring Cleaning of unused global PSets in Phase-2 HLT menus

[mmusich]

PR description:

Title says it all.
Used the following script to identify the unused PSets.

PR validation:

runTheMatrix.py -l ph2_hlt,34434.0 -i all --ibeos

runs fine.

If this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for:

N/A

[cmsbuild]

cms-bot internal usage

[cmsbuild]

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-50293/48337

• There are other open Pull requests which might conflict with changes you have proposed:
  • File HLTrigger/Configuration/python/HLT_75e33_cff.py modified in PR(s): Phase2 Single_Tau_Trigger Path Added #49637, TICL: Consolidate v5 as Default Configuration and Cleanup Legacy Code #49932, Switch to the new tracking baseline (single iteration, CA-extended Patatrack + LST, mkFit) as Phase 2 HLT default #50040
  • File HLTrigger/Configuration/python/HLT_75e33_timing_cff.py modified in PR(s): Phase2 Single_Tau_Trigger Path Added #49637, TICL: Consolidate v5 as Default Configuration and Cleanup Legacy Code #49932, Switch to the new tracking baseline (single iteration, CA-extended Patatrack + LST, mkFit) as Phase 2 HLT default #50040
  • File HLTrigger/Configuration/python/HLT_NGTScouting_cff.py modified in PR(s): TICL: Consolidate v5 as Default Configuration and Cleanup Legacy Code #49932, Switch to the new tracking baseline (single iteration, CA-extended Patatrack + LST, mkFit) as Phase 2 HLT default #50040

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @mmusich for master.

It involves the following packages:

• HLTrigger/Configuration (hlt)

@Martin-Grunewald, @cmsbuild, @mmusich can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@Martin-Grunewald, @ReyerBand, @SohamBhattacharya, @VourMa, @argiro, @missirol, @rchatter, @rovere, @thomreis, @wang0jin this is something you requested to watch as well.
@ftenchini, @mandrenguyen, @sextonkennedy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

[mmusich]

test parameters:

• enable = hlt_p2_integration
• workflows = ph2_hlt

[mmusich]

@cmsbuild, please test

[cmsbuild]

+1

Size: This PR adds an extra 24KB to repository
Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-31a5d0/51716/summary.html
COMMIT: 45e97c0
CMSSW: CMSSW_16_1_X_2026-03-02-2300/el8_amd64_gcc13
Additional Tests: HLT_P2_INTEGRATION
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/50293/51716/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

• No significant changes to the logs found
• Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
• DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 72
• DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 4736055
• DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 0
• DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
• DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 4736035
• DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 20
• DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
• DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 71 files compared)
• Checked 292 log files, 246 edm output root files, 72 DQM output files
• TriggerResults: no differences found

[mmusich]

+hlt

• no differences expected, none seen.

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @sextonkennedy, @mandrenguyen, @ftenchini (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

[mmusich]

hold

• waiting to see Switch to the new tracking baseline (single iteration, CA-extended Patatrack + LST, mkFit) as Phase 2 HLT default #50040 merged to avoid conflicts.

[cmsbuild]

Pull request has been put on hold by @mmusich
They need to issue an unhold command to remove the hold state or L1 can unhold it for all

[mmusich]

unhold

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @sextonkennedy, @ftenchini, @mandrenguyen (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

[mandrenguyen]

+1